Harrison v. Brookhart
| Joseph E Harrison |
| Deanna Brookhart |
| Habeas Attorney General |
| 2:2019cv02091 |
| April 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/26/19. Petitioner's #4 Motion to Withdraw his #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is granted. The Petition was inadvertently filed in the wrong court. This case is dismissed without prejudice. All other pending motions are denied as moot. This case is terminated. No judgment to enter. The clerk is directed to mail a copy of the Petition #1 to Petitioner. (KM, ilcd)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Withdraw #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Joseph E Harrison. Responses due by 5/9/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(KE, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/16/19. On April 12, 2019, Petitioner filed a Petition #1 . The full title states: PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM VOID JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 735 ILCS 5/2-1401(f) (OR) IN THE ALTERNATIVE OF STATE HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 735 ILCS 5/10-124(3) AND (6). The documents caption states: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 6TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, CHAMPIAGN [sic] COUNTY. The envelope was addressed to Office of the Circuit Clerk, Urbana Court House, 218 US Court House, 201 S. Vine St., Urbana, IL 61802. Based on the caption and the Office of the Circuit Clerk designation on the envelope, and because Petitioner seeks relief under state law only, it appears Petitioner meant to file this case in the state Circuit Court of Champaign County rather than in this federal court. Petitioner is directed to inform this court by May 13, 2019 whether he wishes to proceed with a federal habeas petition in this court or whether he meant to file this case in state court. If petitioner informs the court that he meant to file this case in state court, then this court will dismiss the case without prejudice and he must file his documents directly in state court. If petitioner wishes to proceed in this, federal, court, he must either pay the $5 filing fee or file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis as directed in this courts April 12, 2019 Text Order. If Petitioner fails to respond to this Order by May 13, 2019, his Petition #1 will be dismissed without prejudice. ( Other Deadline set for 5/13/2019.) (SKR, ilcd)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of intent to subpoena witnesses (SKR, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to allow news media coverage during sworn testimony by Petitioner Joseph E Harrison. Responses due by 4/26/2019 (SKR, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Joseph E Harrison. (Attachments: #1 Statement regarding exhibits, #2 Exhibits, #3 Envelope)(SKR, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/12/19 directing the Petitioner to pay the filing fee of $5.00 within 30 days of this Order. If Petitioner is unable to pay the required filing fee, he may file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to pay the required filing fee or file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis within 30 days, his Petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in State Custody #1 will be dismissed without prejudice by this court.( Miscellaneous Deadline 5/13/2019) (SKR, ilcd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
