Brown v. Simmons
Petitioner: Charles J Brown
Respondent: Doug Simmons
Not Yet Classified: Habeas Attorney General
Case Number: 2:2019cv02112
Filed: April 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Colin Stirling Bruce
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 7/3/19. Respondent's Motion to Substitute Attorney #4 is GRANTED. The Court directs the Clerk to terminate attorney Michael Cebula from this case. (Attorney Michael L Cebula terminated.) (KM, ilcd)
July 2, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION to Substitute Attorney, Michael Cebula to be replaced by Joshua M. Schneider, by Respondent Doug Simmons. Responses due by 7/16/2019 (Schneider, Joshua)
July 2, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Joshua M Schneider on behalf of Doug Simmons (Schneider, Joshua)
May 28, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Michael L Cebula on behalf of Doug Simmons (Cebula, Michael)
May 21, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 5/21/19. Respondent Doug Simmons shall, within 60 days, answer the Petition #1 pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Petitioner is granted 21 days from the filing of Respondent's Answer to submit a Reply, pursuant to Rule 5(e). (Response deadline set for 7/22/19.) (TC, ilcd)
May 10, 2019 Filing fee paid: $5, receipt number 24626008667. (TC, ilcd) Modified on 5/10/2019 to correct receipt number (KM, ilcd).
April 29, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Charles J Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelopes) (TC, ilcd)
April 29, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/29/19 directing the Petitioner to pay the filing fee of $5.00 within 30 days of this Order. If Petitioner is unable to pay the required filing fee, he may file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to pay the required filing fee or file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis within 30 days, his Petition under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in State Custody #1 will be dismissed without prejudice by this court. (Miscellaneous Deadline set for 5/29/19.) (TC, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Simmons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Doug Simmons
Represented By: Michael L Cebula
Represented By: Joshua M Schneider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles J Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: Habeas Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?