Jones v. Baldwin
| Tyson K Jones |
| John M Baldwin |
| Habeas Attorney General |
| 2:2019cv02120 |
| May 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Change of Address by Tyson K Jones to Stateville CC. (DS, ilcd) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Request Counsel by Petitioner Tyson K Jones. Responses due by 7/15/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(DS, ilcd) |
| Filing 13 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to habeas corpus petition by Respondent John M Baldwin. Responses due by 7/5/2019 (Barbat, Rachel) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 6/20/19. Respondent's Motion to Substitute Attorney #12 is GRANTED. The clerk is directed to substitute Rachel Barbat for Eric Levin as Respondent's attorney in this case (Attorney Eric M Levin terminated). Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer #13 is GRANTED. Respondent has until August 5, 2019, to file his Response in this case (Response due by 8/5/2019). (KM, ilcd)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Substitute Attorney, Eric Levin to be replaced by Rachel Barbat, by Respondent John M Baldwin. Responses due by 6/4/2019 (Barbat, Rachel) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Rachel Lynn Barbat on behalf of John M Baldwin (Barbat, Rachel) |
| Filing 10 Exhibit re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.) by Tyson K Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Part 2, #2 Exhibit Part 3, #3 Exhibit Part 4)(KE, ilcd) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Tyson K Jones from 1004 N Walnut Street, Danville IL 61832 to 1224 Marion Street, Apt C, Danville, IL 61832. (KE, ilcd) |
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable, re #6 . Mail sent to Tyson K Jones (KE, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 5/17/2019. Court docket entry #6 sent to plaintiff Tyson K Jones has been returned as undeliverable. Within 14 days of the entry of this order, plaintiff is directed to show good cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to keep the Court informed of plaintiff's address. Failure to show good cause will result in dismissal of this case. (KE, ilcd)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Eric M Levin on behalf of John M Baldwin (Levin, Eric) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 5/6/2019. Respondent, John M. Baldwin, has 60 days to file a response to the Petition pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. See written order. (Responses due by 7/5/2019) (KE, ilcd) (Main Document 6 replaced on 5/6/2019) (KE, ilcd).
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF A LAWSUIT AND REQUEST TO WAIVE SERVICE OF SUMMONS by Tyson Jones. (TC, ilcd) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING by Tyson K Jones. (TC, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S CERTIFICATION OF A JUDGMENT TO BE REGISTERED IN ANOTHER DISTRICT with attached Judgments. (TC, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Request Counsel by Petitioner Tyson K Jones. Responses due by 5/17/2019. (TC, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5) filed by Tyson K Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Exhibits, #3 Exhibits, #4 Exhibits, #5 Exhibits, #6 Exhibits, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (TC, ilcd) |
| Filing fee paid: $5, receipt number 24626008655. (TC, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
