Patterson v. Dorethy
Ricky Patterson |
Stephanie Dorethy |
Habeas Attorney General |
2:2019cv02198 |
July 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Colin Stirling Bruce |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Update to Original MOTION for the Recruitment of Counsel by Petitioner Ricky Patterson. Responses due by 9/19/19. (TC, ilcd) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Leah M Bendik on behalf of Stephanie Dorethy (Bendik, Leah) |
Filing 8 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (part 1) filed by Ricky Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (part 2), #2 Appendix, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit) (KM, ilcd) |
Filing 7 ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 8/20/19. Petitioner's Motion to Amend #4 is GRANTED. The clerk is directed to file Petitioner's attached Petition (labeled "Motion of Gateway Actual Innocence") as the operative Section 2254 petition in this case. The clerk is directed to MOOT docket entries #1 and #3 . Respondent will be responding to that Amended Petition within 60 days. See written Order. (KM, ilcd) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #8 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ; responses due within 60 days or by 10/21/2019. See Order #7 . (KM, ilcd) |
Filing 6 Letter from Ricky Patterson to the Clerk of Court conveying $5 filing fee. (TC, ilcd) |
Filing fee: $5, receipt number 24626008898. (TC, ilcd) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE by petitioner Ricky Patterson of refiling to include properly labeled exhibits missing from 7/24/19 filing. (KM, ilcd) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Ricky Patterson. Responses due by 8/23/19. (Attachments: #1 Petitioner's Motion of Gateway Actual Innocence #2 Part 1, #2 Petitioner's Motion of Gateway Actual Innocence #2 Part 2, #3 Appendix, #4 Exhibits, #5 Exhibits, #6 Exhibits, #7 Exhibits, #8 Exhibits, #9 Exhibits, #10 Exhibits, #11 Exhibits, #12 Exhibits, #13 Exhibits, #14 Exhibits, #15 IFP and TFL, #16 Motion Requesting Counsel) (TC, ilcd) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 7/24/19 directing the Petitioner to pay the filing fee of $5.00 within 30 days of this Order. If Petitioner is unable to pay the required filing fee, he may file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to pay the required filing fee or file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis within 30 days, his Petition under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in State Custody #1 will be dismissed without prejudice by this court. (Miscellaneous Deadline set for 8/26/19.) (TC, ilcd) |
Filing 3 MOTION of Gateway Actual Innocence by Petitioner Ricky Patterson. Responses due by 8/8/19. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of Motion, #2 Part 3 of Motion, #3 Part 4 of Motion, Appendix and Exhibits) (TC, ilcd) |
Filing 2 Letter from Ricky Patterson to the Court regarding his filing fee. (TC, ilcd) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ricky Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit, #17 Exhibit) (TC, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.