Fitschen v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Gerald Fitschen |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| CSS-Social Security Administration |
| 2:2019cv02259 |
| September 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Eric I Long |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gerald Fitschen. Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/4/2019, answer due 1/28/2020. (Schultz, Barry) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gerald Fitschen. Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/2/2019, answer due 1/28/2020. (Schultz, Barry) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gerald Fitschen. Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/30/2019, answer due 1/28/2020. (Schultz, Barry) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Originals mailed to plaintiff's attorney for service.) (KM, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Barry Schultz on behalf of Gerald Fitschen (Schultz, Barry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-3200940.), filed by Gerald Fitschen. (Attachments: #1 AC decision, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 USM forms)(Schultz, Barry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
