Donahue v. Eva Automation Inc
| Tera Donahue |
| Eva Automation Inc |
| 2:2019cv02303 |
| November 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Eric I Long |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 3/4/2020. The parties' Joint Motion for Extension of Time #9 is GRANTED. Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to 4/3/20. The Status Conference set for 3/6/20 is VACATED. A Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 4/6/20 at 9:45 AM, before Judge Long, Courtroom B, Urbana. If the parties file an agreed proposed discovery schedule on or before 3/30/20, the Court will convert the Rule 16 to a telephonic conference. The parties should see the order #6 entered on 12/2/19 for more information. The Motion to Withdraw #8 is GRANTED. The Court directs the Clerk to terminate attorney Joseph F. Yenouskas from this case. (DS, ilcd)
|
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re Order,, Set/Reset Hearings,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings, #1 Complaint, Set/Reset Deadlines JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Defendant Eva Automation Inc. Responses due by 3/17/2020 (Gersh, Jeffrey) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 3/3/2020. The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 3/6/20 at 10:15 AM is converted to a Status Conference at the same date and time by telephone from Urbana (court will place call) before Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long.(DS, ilcd)
|
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 2/3/2020. Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint and Continue Rule 16 Scheduling Conference #8 is GRANTED. Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to 3/4/20. The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 2/12/20 is CONTINUED to 3/6/20 at 10:15 AM. The Court will rule on the request for leave to withdraw upon the appearance of new counsel. (DS, ilcd)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Eva Automation Inc answer due 3/4/2020. (DS, ilcd) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File the Response to the Complaint, MOTION to Continue Rule 16 Scheduling Conference, MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Defendant Eva Automation Inc. Responses due by 2/14/2020 (Yenouskas, Joseph) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 12/30/19. The parties' Joint Motion to Extend Deadline and Continue Rule 16 #7 is GRANTED. Defendants' deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to 2/3/20. The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 1/15/20 is RESCHEDULED to 2/12/20 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom B in Urbana before Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long. (TC, ilcd)
|
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint, Joint MOTION to Continue Rule 16 Scheduling Conference by Defendant Eva Automation Inc. Responses due by 1/10/2020 (Yenouskas, Joseph) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 12/2/2019. Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 1/15/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom B in Urbana before Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long. See written Order.(DS, ilcd)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Eva Automation Inc answer due 1/13/2020. (DS, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 12/2/2019. Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time #3 is GRANTED. Defendants deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to 1/13/20. (DS, ilcd)
|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by Eva Automation Inc. (Yenouskas, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Joseph F Yenouskas on behalf of Eva Automation Inc (Yenouskas, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Response to the Complaint by Defendant Eva Automation Inc. Responses due by 12/11/2019 (Yenouskas, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Eva Automation Inc and returned to counsel for service. (DS, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eva Automation, Inc. dba Bowers & Wilkins ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-3238635.), filed by Tera Donahue. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Sweet, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Donahue v. Eva Automation Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eva Automation Inc | |
| Represented By: | Joseph F Yenouskas |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey F Gersh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tera Donahue | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin J Sweet |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Dengler Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
