Becker v. Commissioner of Social Security
Nina C. Becker and Nina C Becker |
Commissioner of Social Security |
CSS-Social Security Administration |
2:2019cv02349 |
December 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Colin Stirling Bruce |
Eric I Long |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Mailed to attorney for plaintiff for service. (SKR, ilcd) |
Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 24626009296 (KE, ilcd) |
Filing 5 ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 1/2/20 denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. SEE WRITTEN ORDER. ( Miscellaneous Deadline 7/2/2020). (SKR, ilcd) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Meredith E Marcus on behalf of Nina C. Becker (Marcus, Meredith) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Frederick J Daley, Jr on behalf of Nina C. Becker (Daley, Frederick) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Nina C. Becker. Responses due by 1/9/2020 (Attachments: #1 USM-285 (Commissioner), #2 USM-285 (Attorney General), #3 USM-285 (U.S. Attorney))(Daley, Frederick) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Nina C. Becker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summonses Combined)(Daley, Frederick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.