Powell v. Calloway
| John A Powell |
| Victor Calloway |
| Habeas Attorney General |
| 2:2020cv02027 |
| February 13, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 2/14/2020. The court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 filed by Petitioner in this case. Petitioner's conviction originated in Cook County, Illinois, which is located in the Northern District of Illinois. Therefore, the clerk is directed to transfer this case to the Northern District. (JMB, ilcd)
|
| Case transferred to the Northern District of Illinois. Case was electronically submitted to the transferee court. (JMB, ilcd) |
| Remark: Case transferred from Illinois Central has been opened in Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.1 as case 1:20-cv-01112, filed 02/14/2020. (KM, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 Letter from Clerk of Court returning Trust Fund Check #129348 for $5 filing fee to Danville Correctional as incorrect payee. (KM, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John A. Powell. (Attachments: #1 Affidavits, #2 Exhibis, #3 USCA letter, #4 Envelopes) (KM, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
