Williams v. Hammers
Petitioner: Eric Dewayne Williams
Respondent: Justin Hammers
Interested Party: Habeas Attorney General
Case Number: 2:2020cv02151
Filed: June 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Colin Stirling Bruce
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2020 Filing 8 Exhibits re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Eric Dewayne Williams. (SKR, ilcd)
June 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 6/30/20. Petitioner' s Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #2 is DENIED as moot. Respondent has sixty (60) days to file a response to the Petition. (Responses due by 8/28/2020). SEE WRITTEN ORDER. (SKR, ilcd)
June 25, 2020 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 14626037803. (JS, ilcd)
June 22, 2020 Filing 6 Letter from Eric Dewayne Williams with Trust Fund Check #138583 for $5.00 filing fee enclosed. (KM, ilcd)
June 22, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time by Petitioner Eric Dewayne Williams. Responses due by 7/6/2020 (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (KM, ilcd)
June 4, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 6/4/20. On June 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . He indicates that he is incarcerated at Western Illinois Correctional Center, but has not submitted a trust fund ledger as required by 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(2). Petitioner has 30 days from the date of this order to either: (1) pay the $5.00 filing fee, or (2) file the required trust fund ledger from his correctional institution showing he is not financially able to pay the $5.00 fee. Failure to do so will result in the denial of the Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 and the dismissal of this case without prejudice. ( filing fee or trust fund ledger due by 7/3/2020) (SKR, ilcd)
June 3, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Stay and Abeyance by Petitioner Eric Dewayne Williams. Responses due by 6/17/2020. (DS, ilcd)
June 3, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Request Counsel by Petitioner Eric Dewayne Williams. Responses due by 6/17/2020. (DS, ilcd)
June 3, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Eric Dewayne Williams. Responses due by 6/17/2020. (DS, ilcd)
June 3, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Eric Dewayne Williams. (Attachments: #1 Notice re Privacy Issues)(DS, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Hammers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Justin Hammers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eric Dewayne Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Habeas Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?