Hughes v. Vermillion County Sheriff's and Police Dept.
| Warren L. Hughes |
| Vermillion County Sheriff's and Police Dept. |
| 2:2020cv02158 |
| June 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sara Darrow |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STRICKEN PURSUANT TO TEXT ORDER entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 7/20/20: JUDGMENT entered. (KB, ilcd) Modified on 7/20/2020 to strike Judgment as it is duplicative of #3 Judgment (KB, ilcd).
|
| Filing 3 JUDGMENT ENTERED. (ED, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER STRIKING/VACATING DOCUMENT entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 7/20/20: Clerk is directed to strike #4 Judgment as it is duplicative of document #3 Judgment. (KB, ilcd)
|
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 7/15/2020. Text Order: On June 16, 2020, the Court directed Petitioner to either pay the $5 filing fee or file a supplemental petition to proceed in forma pauperis, attaching his trust fund ledgers for the last six months. The supplemental petition was due July 1, 2020, but nothing has been filed. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice and closed for failure to pay the filing fee. No judgment will enter. (KB, ilcd)
|
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 6/16/20. Petitioner has filed a Petition for Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Petitioner asks for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but he has not included a copy of his trust fund ledger. Petitioner is directed to either pay the $5 filing fee or provide the Court with a signed Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs that also includes a copy of his trust fund ledger, certified by the appropriate institutional officer, showing all receipts, expenditures and balances for the last six months. Petitioner shall do so on or before July 1, 2020, or the Court will dismiss the case without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. The Clerk is directed to send Petitioner a copy of the forms for proceeding in forma pauperis if not already done. (AO 239 IFP Long Form enclosed) (KB, ilcd)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION (in letter form) for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Warren L. Hughes. Responses due by 6/22/2020 (RL, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Warren L. Hughes.(RL, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hughes v. Vermillion County Sheriff's and Police Dept. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Vermillion County Sheriff's and Police Dept. | |
| Represented By: | W. Scott Simpson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Warren L. Hughes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
