Crawley v. Hartshorn et al
| David L Crawley |
| . Ward, Marci .., Pat Hartshorn and Shelly .. |
| 2:2020cv02282 |
| October 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| James E Shadid |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 11/12/2020. The Court has granted Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and accessed an initial partial filing fee of $25. See October 9, 2020, Text Order. The Court has also directed Plaintiff's facility to begin making the required payments pursuant to the IFP statute. Plaintiff has now filed a motion to reconsider the order #5 . Plaintiff says he cannot afford to pay the $350 filing fee. Since the Court has granted Plaintiff's IFP motion, he can proceed with his lawsuit without first paying the entire fee. However, the Court cannot waive the $350 filing fee. Instead, Plaintiff is responsible for paying the filing fee when he has sufficient funds in his account. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Therefore, the motion is denied #5 . Plaintiff is also reminded he must pay the initial partial filing fee of $25 or his case could be dismissed. The Court will extend the deadline for payment of the $25 to November 30, 2020.(SAG, ilcd)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration re Text Order on Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff David L Crawley. Responses due by 11/20/2020 (VH, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge James Shadid. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division, 100 NE Monroe Street, Peoria, IL 61602. Merit Review Deadline set for 10/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $25.00. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court within 30 days of this order. After payment of the initial partial filing fee (or immediately if no funds are available for that payment) the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source, including gifts. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff's account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. Plaintiff is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the initial partial filing fee and required monthly payments are made. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff's place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office, and to Plaintiff. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 10/9/2020. (SAG, ilcd)
|
| Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. by David L Crawley (SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by David L Crawley.(SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by David L Crawley. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet, #2 envelope)(SAG, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
