United States of America v. $81200.00 in US Currency
| United States of America |
| $81,200.00 in US Currency and $81200.00 in US Currency |
| 2:2021cv02013 |
| January 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Eric I Long |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by $81200.00 in US Currency re #8 Answer to Complaint (Kwon, Jae) |
| Filing 8 Defendants' Verified ANSWER to Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by $81200.00 in US Currency.(Kwon, Jae) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing re #5 Notice of Appearance of Attorney, #6 Claim (Kwon, Jae) |
| Filing 6 CLAIM Verified Claim by Defendant $81200.00 in US Currency. (Kwon, Jae) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Jae K Kwon on behalf of All Defendants (Kwon, Jae) |
| Filing 4 WARRANT/Writ of Body Attachment Returned Executed as to $81,200.00 in US Currency. (DS, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CIVIL FORFEITURE TO TIAKAWA LEONDIS-TERRELL PIERCE (Kim, Richard) |
| Filing 2 +++ WARRANT/WRIT OF BODY ATTACHMENT issued (sealed). (DS, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against $81,200.00 in US Currency, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DS, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
