Earl v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
Kenneth A Earl |
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc |
2:2021cv02036 |
February 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Colin Stirling Bruce |
Eric I Long |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 3/18/2021. Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw #8 is GRANTED. Defendant's Motion to Withdraw #10 is GRANTED. The Court directs the Clerk to terminate attorneys Matthew R. McCarley, Arati C. Furness, and Richard North, Jr. from this case. The Joint Motion for Stay #12 is GRANTED. This case is stayed for 90 days. All scheduled deadlines and court settings are vacated. The Court directs the Clerk to administratively close this case. See Thomas v. Wardell, 2020 WL 1042627, n. 3 (7th Cir. March 4, 2020) ("Administratively closing a case moves it to a court's inactive docket, while the court retains jurisdiction for purposes of future activities on the case.") The case will be reopened when the stay is lifted. (DS) |
Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Stay by Plaintiff Kenneth A Earl. Responses due by 3/31/2021 (Schulte, Steven) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Michael Thomas Baier on behalf of Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc, C R Bard Inc (Baier, Michael) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney (Unopposed) by Defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc, C R Bard Inc. Responses due by 3/31/2021 (Elster, Jason) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Jason B Elster on behalf of Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc, C R Bard Inc (Elster, Jason) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Plaintiff Kenneth A Earl. Responses due by 3/31/2021 (Schulte, Steven) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Steven S Schulte on behalf of Kenneth A Earl (Schulte, Steven) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 2/24/2021. The Court directs the parties to file a proposed Rule 26(f) scheduling order within 21 days. (Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/17/2021.)(DS) |
Filing 6 MDL Remark: Certified docket sheet from District of Arizona (Phoenix Division) Case #15-md-2641-DGC (Attachments: #1 MDL 2:15-md-2641 Case Management Order, #2 MDL 2:15-md-2641 Transfer Order) (KM) |
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Arizona; Case Number 2:18-cv-02911. . |
Remark: Transferring Case to the Central District of Illinois via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 4 AMENDED SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (FIFTH). See Order for Complete Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 2/11/2021. (MAP) |
Filing 3 *AMENDED By Doc. #4 *SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (FIFTH). See Order for Complete Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 2/9/2021. (MAP) *Modified on 2/17/2021 (MAP). |
Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G. Campbell, with member case number: CV-18-2911-PHX-DGC. This case is included in MDL-2641. All future pleadings or documents should be filed in the Lead Case: 2:15-md-2641-DGC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 1 *COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15960577 filed by Kenneth A Earl. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAP) *Modified on 9/17/2018 to correct receipt number (MAP)*. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.