Eiltes v. Menard Inc et al
| Roy Eiltes |
| Menard Inc and Daniel Douglas |
| 2:2021cv02066 |
| March 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Eric I Long |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion re #11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, #8 MOTION to Remand filed by Defendants Daniel Douglas, Menard Inc. (Andrews, W) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 4/26/2021. The agreed Motion to Continue Initial Status Conference #12 is GRANTED. The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 4/28/21 is CONTINUED to 7/7/21 at 9:45 AM, Courtroom B, Urbana. The parties' deadline to submit an agreed Rule 26(f) plan is 7/1/21.(BMG)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Continue Agreed Initial Status Conference by Defendants Daniel Douglas, Menard Inc. Responses due by 5/7/2021 (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Andrews, W) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/21/2021. Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time #11 is GRANTED. Defendants' response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand #8 is now due 5/12/2021. Defendants' motion does not say whether Plaintiff objects to the motion. The court reminds the parties that it expects them to follow the Local Rules. Relevant here, Local Rule 6.1 says that motions for extension of time must state whether opposing counsel has objection to the motion.(BMG)
|
| Filing 11 Motion for Extension of Time to File RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Remand filed by Defendants Daniel Douglas, Menard Inc. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Andrews, W) Modified on 4/20/2021 to show the correct title of the document. (JMB). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing re #8 MOTION to Remand , #9 Memorandum in Support of Motion (O'Connor, Kevin) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Remand filed by Plaintiff Roy Eiltes. (O'Connor, Kevin) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Remand by Plaintiff Roy Eiltes. Responses due by 4/28/2021 (O'Connor, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 Defendant, Menard, Inc's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Menard Inc. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Andrews, W) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Daniel Douglas, Menard Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Andrews, W) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 3/29/2021 setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 4/28/2021 9:45 AM by personal appearance in Courtroom B in Urbana before Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long. See written Order.(BMG) Modified on 4/12/2021 to adjust language (BMG).
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by John Edward Motylinski on behalf of All Defendants (Motylinski, John) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Adverse Party (Attachments: #1 Filed Notice of Removal)(Andrews, W) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by W Anthony Andrews on behalf of All Defendants (Andrews, W) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 21st Judicial Circuit, Kankakee, IL, case number 2021 L 7 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0753-3622858), filed by Daniel Douglas, Menard, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Return of Service/Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 3 Demand Letter)(Andrews, W) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/26/2021: #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (JMB). Modified on 3/30/2021 to specify exhibits (BMG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
