Gushi v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Joseph Gushi |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| CSS-Social Security Administration |
| 2:2022cv02006 |
| January 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Eric I Long |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Joseph Gushi as to Commissioner of Social Security (US Attorney General) 2/4/2022. (DS) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Commissioner of Social Security served on 1/12/2022, answer due 5/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(DS) |
Filing 4
ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 1/12/2022. Plaintiff's Amended Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees #2 is GRANTED. See written Order. (DS)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Joseph Stephen Sellers on behalf of Joseph Gushi (Sellers, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Joseph Gushi.(Sellers, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Joseph Gushi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 USM-285 form, #6 USM-285 form, #7 USM-285 form)(Sellers, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
