Strode v. Christie Business Holdings Company PC
| Michele L. Strode, Michele L Strode and Artur Podroykin |
| Christie Business Holdings Company, P.C., (d/b/a "Christie Clinic") and Christie Business Holdings Company PC doing business as Christie Clinic |
| 2:2022cv02081 |
| April 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Eric I Long |
| Karen L McNaught |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. See d/e #16 . Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 provides that a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order before any defendant has filed "either an answer or a motion for summary judgment." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Plaintiffs' notice complies with this rule. Accordingly, this action has been DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. All pending deadlines and settings are VACATED. Each party to bear its own costs. No judgment to enter. This case is CLOSED. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/22/2022. (SKN)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Artur Podroykin, Michele L Strode. (Klinger, Gary) |
| Filing 15 Second MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Christie Business Holdings Company PC. Responses due by 11/18/2022 (Schieber, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT (Consolidated Class Action Complaint) against Christie Business Holdings Company PC, filed by Michele L Strode, Artur Podroykin.(Klinger, Gary) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by William B Federman on behalf of Artur Podroykin (Federman, William) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Paul John Yovanic, Jr on behalf of Christie Business Holdings Company PC (Yovanic, Paul) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #8 is DENIED AS MOOT; Plaintiffs' motions for consolidation #9 and designation of interim co-lead class counsel #10 are GRANTED. See written Order. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 08/22/2022. (SKN)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Interim Co-Lead Counsel Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g)(3) and Memorandum in Support by Plaintiff Michele L Strode. Responses due by 7/21/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Transcript of Settlement Hearing, #2 Exhibit B. Milberg CV, #3 Exhibit C. Federman & Sherwood CV, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Klinger, Gary) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Consolidate Cases Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a)(2) and Memorandum in Support by Plaintiff Michele L Strode. Responses due by 7/21/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Klinger, Gary) |
| Filing 8 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Christie Business Holdings Company PC. Responses due by 7/11/2022 (Schieber, Jeffrey) |
|
TEXT ORDER by U S Magistrate Judge Karen McNaught: Defendant Christie Business Holdings Company PC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File its Responsive Pleading #6 is ALLOWED for the reasons set forth in Defendant's unopposed motion. The Answer is due 6/27/2022 and the Response to Motion Deadline is 8/8/2022. Entered by Magistrate Judge Karen L. McNaught on 5/31/2022. (MAS)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Jaimin Shah on behalf of Christie Business Holdings Company PC (Shah, Jaimin) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Christie Business Holdings Company PC. Responses due by 6/27/2022 (Schieber, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Daniel Reza Saeedi on behalf of Christie Business Holdings Company PC (Saeedi, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Jeffrey M Schieber on behalf of Christie Business Holdings Company PC (Schieber, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michele L Strode. Christie Business Holdings Company PC served on 4/22/2022, answer due 5/13/2022. (Klinger, Gary) |
|
TEXT ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on April 25, 2022. This case reassigned to Judge Sue E. Myerscough and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen McNaught for all further proceedings. (TC)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Christie Business Holdings Company, P.C., (d/b/a "Christie Clinic"). (Mailed to Plaintiff's counsel for service.) (TC) |
|
TEXT ORDER OF RECUSAL entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/13/22. Judge Colin S. Bruce disqualifies and recuses himself from participation in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 455(a). The file is forwarded to Chief Judge Sara L. Darrow for reassignment. (TC)
|
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Sara Darrow pending reassignment. Judge Colin Stirling Bruce no longer assigned to case. Entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 4/13/22. (TC) Modified on 4/14/2022 to add "pending reassignment." (TC).
|
|
TEXT ORDER OF RECUSAL entered by Judge Eric I. Long on 4/13/22. Judge Eric I. Long disqualifies and recuses himself from participation in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 455(a). The file is forwarded to Chief Judge Sara L. Darrow for reassignment. (TC)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class Action Complaint against Christie Business Holdings Company, P.C., (d/b/a "Christie Clinic") ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-3912963.), filed by Michele L. Strode. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Klinger, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
