Moxchange LLC v. Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited
Moxchange LLC |
Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited |
2:2022cv02141 |
June 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Colin Stirling Bruce |
Eric I Long |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 8/24/2022. The Court hereby vacates the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for August 30, 2022. The Court adopts the deadlines in the Parties' Agree Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting #12 . See written Order for deadlines.(BMG) |
Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Moxchange LLC. (Bennett, David) |
Filing 11 ORDER setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 8/1/2022. Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 8/30/2022 at 9:45 AM by personal appearance in Courtroom B in Urbana before Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long. See written Order. (BMG) |
Filing 10 NOTICE Corporate Disclosure Statement (Wineland, Charles) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited. (Wineland, Charles) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Charles D Wineland, III on behalf of Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited (Wineland, Charles) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited.(Wineland, Charles) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Moxchange LLC. Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited served on 7/8/2022, answer due 7/29/2022. (Bennett, David) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited and mailed to plaintiff's attorney for service. (SKR) |
Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent by Moxchange LLC. (Bennett, David) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by Moxchange LLC. (Bennett, David) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by David R Bennett on behalf of Moxchange LLC (Bennett, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-3972748.), filed by Moxchange LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 7,233,664, #2 Exhibit B - excerpt from prosecution history of U.S. Patent No. 7,233,664, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons for Issuance)(Bennett, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Moxchange LLC v. Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Moxchange LLC | |
Represented By: | David R Bennett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited | |
Represented By: | Charles D Wineland, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.