Cahoon v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: JEFFREY CAHOON
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2022cv02214
Filed: October 6, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Colin Stirling Bruce
Referring Judge: Eric I Long
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2022 Filing 7 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner of the Social Security Administration 10/19/2022. (JMB)
October 26, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Jean M Godfrey on behalf of Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Godfrey, Jean)
October 14, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration served on 10/14/2022, answer due 2/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(BMG)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 10/13/2022. The Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees #2 is GRANTED. The USMS is ordered to serve a copy of the complaint, summons, and order upon the Defendant. See written Order. (BMG) Modified on 10/14/2022 (BMG).
October 7, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce and Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long; case reviewed changes made; flags added. (TC) Modified on 10/11/2022 to add that clerk contacted atty and asked for completed USM form (TC).
October 6, 2022 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, filed by Jeffrey Cahoon.(BMG) Modified on 10/14/2022 (BMG).
October 6, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jeffrey Cahoon. Responses due by 10/20/2022. (TC)
October 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT , filed by JEFFREY CAHOON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summonses, #3 Petition to Proceed in Forma Pauperis)(Konoski, Bryan) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/7/2022 to make Complaint main document with attachments) (TC). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/13/2022: #4 USM 285 Form) (TC).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cahoon v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JEFFREY CAHOON
Represented By: Bryan Matthew Konoski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Represented By: US ATTY-URBANA SSA
Represented By: Jean M Godfrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?