Collins v. Commissioner of Social Security
Vicki Naomi Collins |
Commissioner of Social Security |
CSS-Social Security Administration |
2:2022cv02270 |
December 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Colin Stirling Bruce |
Eric I Long |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Certified Administrative Record by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Responses due by 2/24/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Defendant's Attorney in Support of Motion for Extension to File Answer and Certified Administrative Record)(Gibbons, Catherine) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Catherine Leigh Gibbons on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Gibbons, Catherine) |
NOTICE of Social Security Complaint filed. Commissioner of Social Security answer due on 2/13/2023. (BMG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-4092788.), filed by Vicki Naomi Collins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Notice of Decision-Unfavorable, #2 Exhibit B- Notice of Appeals Council Action, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Comerford, Ida) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.