Johnson v. Adkins
Petitioner: John F Johnson
Respondent: Felicia Adkins
Case Number: 2:2023cv02004
Filed: January 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: James E Shadid
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2023 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 200000470 (KE)
February 22, 2023 Set Deadlines: Miscellaneous Deadline 3/24/2023 (JS)
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid: The Court has discovered that Petitioner did not properly receive notice of the Court's January 9, 2023 Text Order requiring him to pay the filing fee within 30 days. To ensure Petitioner has every opportunity to comply with the Court's order prior to his case being closed, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to REOPEN the case. Petitioner is now notified that he has not paid the filing fee. Petitioner is directed to pay the filing fee of $5.00 within 30 days of this Order. If Petitioner is unable to pay the required filing fee, he may file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to pay the required filing fee or file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis within 30 days, his Petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 for Writ of Habeas #1 will be dismissed without prejudice by this court. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 2/22/2023. (JS)
February 14, 2023 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 2/14/2023: In the Court's January 9, 2023 Text Order, Petitioner was ordered to pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. He has failed to do so. Accordingly, his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 #1 is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. This case is CLOSED. (JS)
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 1/9/2023. Petitioner has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 but has not paid the filing fee. Petitioner is directed to pay the filing fee of $5.00 within 30 days of this Order. If Petitioner is unable to pay the required filing fee, he may file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to pay the required filing fee or file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis within 30 days, his Petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 for Writ of Habeas #1 will be dismissed without prejudice by this court. (AH)
January 6, 2023 Remark: Emailed LC 60 regarding no filing fee or IFP received with Habeas Petition. (AH)
January 5, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by John F Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Adkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John F Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Felicia Adkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?