McCray v. Donothan
Leonardo McCray |
Greg Donothan |
Habeas Attorney General |
2:2023cv02108 |
May 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Colin Stirling Bruce |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Remark: Docket sheet to scanning facility re #11 Letter. (TC) |
Filing 11 Letter from Leonardo McCray asking for contact information on defense attorney. (TC) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Jury Demand by Petitioner Leonardo McCray. Responses due by 6/15/2023. (BMG) |
|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Alasdair Whitney on behalf of Greg Donothan (Whitney, Alasdair) |
Filing 8 Remark: Docket Sheet to Petitioner. (BMG) |
Filing 7 Letter from Petitioner Leonardo McCray regarding case information. (BMG) |
|
Filing 5 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Leonardo McCray. (BMG) |
|
Filing 3 MOTION to Request Counsel by Petitioner Leonardo McCray. Responses due by 5/24/2023. (BMG) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Leonardo McCray. Responses due by 5/24/2023. (BMG) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Leonardo McCray. (Attachments: #1 Scanning Cover Sheet)(BMG) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/11/2023: #2 Attachments) (TC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.