Kulkarni et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Preeti Kulkarni and Earthsense Inc |
| Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 2:2023cv02157 |
| July 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Eric I Long |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas.(Swett, Kathy) |
| Remark: On 7/19/23, Plaintiff filed an Application for Refund of Electronic Filing Fee Receipt #AILCDC-4254462 due to a duplicative payment. The Application was granted and a refund of $402.00 was processed to the credit card used for the original transaction. (TK) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and mailed to counsel for the Plaintiff for service. (JMB) |
| Filing 2 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Earthsense, Inc.. (McClure, Lauren) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Other Relief against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-4254478.), filed by Preeti Kulkarni. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 AG Summons, #4 Jaddou Summons, #5 Mayorkas Summons, #6 US Attorney Summons)(McClure, Lauren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
