Cole v. Archer Daniels Midland et al
Darren Cole |
Archer Daniels Midland, Garrett Garver, Eric Raukman, Don Ridgeway, Clint Gannon, Ken Cole and Michelle . |
2:2024cv02078 |
April 10, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Colin Stirling Bruce |
Eric I Long |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Eric I. Long on 4/11/24. Plaintiff submitted a Complaint and accompanying paperwork to this Court. Plaintiff's Motion to Request Counsel was incomplete. The Clerk is directed to mail a blank Motion to Request Counsel form to Plaintiff to complete and return to the Clerk. In addition, Plaintiff did not submit completed summons forms or US Marshal 285 forms for each Defendant. The Clerk is directed to mail blank summons and US Marshal 285 forms to Plaintiff. Plaintiff has 14 days to complete the forms and return them to the Clerk. (Miscellaneous deadline set for 4/25/24.)(TC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Proposed Summons. (DW) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Darren Cole. Responses due by 4/24/2024 (DW) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Darren Cole. Responses due by 4/24/2024. (DW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Darren Cole. (DW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.