Cotton v. Hughes et al
| James Cotton |
| Latoya Hughes, Felicia Atkins, Chase Wilhelm, Christopher Easton and John Does 1-9 |
| 2:2024cv02084 |
| April 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Letter Requesting Trust Fund Ledger. Trust fund ledger sheets due by 5/2/2024. (KE) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff James Cotton. Responses due by 5/2/2024 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit Part 1, #3 Exhibit Part 2, #4 Proposed Order)(KE) |
| Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by James Cotton (KE) |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by James Cotton.(KE) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Urbana Division, 201 S Vine Street, Urbana, IL 61802.Merit Review Deadline set for 5/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(KE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by James Cotton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(KE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
