Watkins v. Wrighton et al
Plaintiff: Marty Watkins
Defendant: Matt Newell, City of Decatur, Scot Wrighton and Julie Moore-Wolfe
Case Number: 2:2024cv02170
Filed: July 22, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Colin Stirling Bruce
Referring Judge: Eric I Long
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2024 Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Amended Complaint) filed by Plaintiff Marty Watkins. (DS)
September 6, 2024 Filing 15 RULE 12(C) NOTICE entered re #13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Amended Complaint) (BMG)
September 6, 2024 Filing 14 MEMORANDUM re #13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Amended Complaint) by City of Decatur, Julie Moore-Wolfe, Matt Newell, Scot Wrighton. (Wiese, Amanda)
September 6, 2024 Filing 13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Amended Complaint) by Defendants City of Decatur, Julie Moore-Wolfe, Matt Newell, Scot Wrighton. Responses due by 9/20/2024 (Wiese, Amanda)
September 4, 2024 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 9/4/2024. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(E), due to the filing of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint #12 , Defendants' Motion to Dismiss #8 is denied as moot with leave to refile. (JMB)
August 29, 2024 Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against City of Decatur, Julie Moore-Wolfe, Matt Newell, Scot Wrighton, filed by Marty Watkins.(DS)
August 19, 2024 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 8/19/2024. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint #11 is GRANTED. Within 14 days, Plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint. In the future, if Plaintiff files a document that requires leave of the Court, Plaintiff must attach the proposed document as an exhibit to the motion to file. If the Court grants the motion to file, the Clerk will file the attached document electronically. See Civil LR 7.1(E).(DS)
August 15, 2024 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Marty Watkins. Responses due by 8/29/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(DS)
August 9, 2024 Filing 10 RULE 12(C) NOTICE entered re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM to pro se plaintiff. (DS)
August 8, 2024 Filing 9 MEMORANDUM re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by City of Decatur, Julie Moore-Wolfe, Matt Newell, Scot Wrighton. (Wiese, Amanda)
August 8, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants City of Decatur, Julie Moore-Wolfe, Matt Newell, Scot Wrighton. Responses due by 8/22/2024 (Wiese, Amanda)
August 8, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Amanda J Wiese on behalf of All Defendants (Wiese, Amanda)
August 8, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Amanda J Wiese on behalf of Matt Newell (Wiese, Amanda) Modified on 8/8/2024 (RAH).
August 8, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Amanda J Wiese on behalf of Matt Newell (Wiese, Amanda) Modified on 8/8/2024 (RAH).
August 8, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Amanda J Wiese on behalf of Julie Moore-Wolfe (Wiese, Amanda) Modified on 8/8/2024 (RAH).
August 8, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Amanda J Wiese on behalf of City of Decatur (Wiese, Amanda) Modified on 8/8/2024 (RAH).
July 22, 2024 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to City of Decatur, Julie Moore-Wolfe, Matt Newell, Scot Wrighton. Originals hand delivered to Plaintiff at Urbana, IL Clerk's Office for service. (RAH)
July 22, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $405 Receipt #200001314) filed by Marty Watkins. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(RAH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Watkins v. Wrighton et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matt Newell
Represented By: Amanda J Wiese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Decatur
Represented By: Amanda J Wiese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scot Wrighton
Represented By: Amanda J Wiese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Julie Moore-Wolfe
Represented By: Amanda J Wiese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marty Watkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?