Hollins v. Macon County Sheriff's Office
| Diamante Lovell Hollins |
| Macon County Sheriff's Office |
| 2:2025cv02199 |
| July 1, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Michael M Mihm |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT entered. (VH) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 9/12/2025. On 7/30/2025, this Court entered a Merit Review Order #8 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A and dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint as a violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court gave Plaintiff 30 days to file an Amended Complaint and warned Plaintiff that the failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this case with prejudice. The time period has now passed, and Plaintiff has not filed an Amended Complaint or requested an extension of time. Therefore, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Plaintiff must still pay the filing fee of $350 even though his case has been dismissed. (d/e 7/16/2025) If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). A motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis must set forth the issues Plaintiff plans to present on appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). If Plaintiff chooses to appeal, he will be liable for the $605 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal.(VH)
|
| Prisoner Initial Partial Filing Fee received 9/8/25, in the amount of $ 15.09; receipt number 100007455. (JA) |
|
Filing 8
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 7/29/2025. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:1) Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as a violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the entry of this Order to file an Amended Complaint. Failure to file a timely Amended Complaint will result in the dismissal of this case, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint will replace Plaintiff's original Complaint in its entirety. The Amended Complaint must contain all allegations against all Defendants. Piecemeal amendments are not accepted.2) Plaintiff's Motion to Request Counsel #5 is DENIED. See full written Order.(VH)
|
| Filing 7 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER (KLC) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $17.16. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court within 30 days of this order. After payment of the initial partial filing fee (or immediately if no funds are available for that payment) the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source, including gifts. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff's account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff's place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office, and to Plaintiff. Prisoner Prepayment due by 8/15/2025. Entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 7/16/2025. (SAG)
|
| Filing 6 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. (KLC) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Diamante Lovell Hollins. Responses due by 7/16/2025 (JS) |
| Filing 4 Letter Requesting Trust Fund Ledger. Trust fund ledger sheets due by 7/15/2025. (JS) |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Diamante Lovell Hollins.(JS) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Michael Mihm. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division,100 NE Monroe Street,Peoria,IL 61602. Merit Review Deadline set for 7/22/2025. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(JS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Macon County Sheriff's Office, filed by Diamante Lovell Hollins.(JS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hollins v. Macon County Sheriff's Office | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Diamante Lovell Hollins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Macon County Sheriff's Office | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
