Roedl v. Hanna et al
| Crystal Hall Roedl |
| Jennifer Hanna, Champaign Senior Care Inc, Home Instead Inc and CP Care LLC doing business as Home Instead Champaign |
| 2:2025cv02286 |
| October 23, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Eric I Long |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Remand filed by Defendant Home Instead Inc. (Argentieri, Julia) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Remand by Plaintiff Crystal Hall Roedl. Responses due by 11/17/2025 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Reynolds, Zack) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Home Instead Inc.(Argentieri, Julia) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Elena Barbara Roper on behalf of Home Instead Inc (Roper, Elena) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Julia Pearce Argentieri on behalf of Home Instead Inc (Argentieri, Julia) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, case number 2025LA000150 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILCDC-4854284), filed by Home Instead, Inc..(Argentieri, Julia) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/24/2025: #1 Civil Cover Sheet |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.