Whitlow et al v. Martin et al
| Steve Whitlow, Bruce Carmitchel, Lori Coonen, Melanie Dennison, Sharmin Doering, Jileen Eisele, Janice Gower, Stuart Hunt, II, Brad Jones, Catherine Kennedy, Barbara Mabie, Adil Rahman, Anthony Saputo, Cathy Scaife, Don Williams and Jason Yoakum |
| Timothy Martin, Michael R Stout and Scott Doubet |
| Gary Hannig |
| 3:2004cv03211 |
| October 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Jeanne E. Scott |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
300
OPINION denying 271 Defendants' Martin, Doubet and Stout Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 285 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Motion for Summary Judgment. Entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 6/15/2010. (CT, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
270
OPINION by U.S. Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore: Gary Hannig's Objections to Subpoena for Production of Documents 254 are SUSTAINED, in part, and OVERRULED, in part. See written order. (LB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
251
OPINION by U.S. Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Complete Discovery Responses from Plaintiffs or in the Alternative, to Strike Allegations 247 ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. See written order. ( Miscellaneous Deadline of 8/14/2009 set.) Entered by Judge Cudmore on 7/22/09. (LB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
221
OPINION. The Corrected Objections to Magistrate's Denial of Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Supplemental Disclosure Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26 and Grant of Certain Provisions in the November 19, 2008 Order (d/e 215) and the Non- Party Office of the Governor's Objections to the November 19 Order (d/e 218) are OVERRULED, and the Opinion entered October 28, 2008 (d/e 201) and Order entered November 19, 2008 (d/e 208) are AFFIRMED. The stay entered by Text Order entered Nov ember 25, 2008, is lifted. This matter is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore to revise the schedule in this matter and to set dates for compliance by the Office of the Governor with the November 19, 2008, Order (d/e 208). Entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 1/16/2009. (CC, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
201
OPINION: Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (d/e 186) is ALLOWED; Defendants' Motion to Strike Supplemental Disclosures (d/e 187) is DENIED. Fact discovery is extended from the date of this order through the dat e of December 29, 2008 with the limitations on fact discovery as noted herein. Hearing set November 13, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. in open court on Plaintiffs' subpoena to the Office of the Governor. The dispositive motion deadline is reset to January 23, 2009. Final pretrial reset April 20, 2009 at 10:30 a.m. before U.S. District Judge Jeanne Scott. Jury Trial rescheduled April 21, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. before Judge Scott. Entered by Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore on 10/28/08. (ME, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
185
OPINION. The Plaintiffs' Appeal of Opinion of Magistrate Judge (d/e 176) and Third Party Office of the Governor of the State of Illinois' Appeal of Magistrate Judge's Order of June 12, 2008 (d/e 177) are both DENIED. The Opinion of United States Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore entered June 12, 2008 (d/e 175) is AFFIRMED. This matter is referred to Judge Cudmore for setting deadlines for compliance with his Opinion. Entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 9/9/2008. (CC, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
