AMCO Insurance Company v. Swagat Group LLC et al
| 3:2007cv03330 |
| December 21, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Insurance Office |
| Charles H. Evans |
| Jeanne E. Scott |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
OPINION granting plaintiff's 49 Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary Judgment is entered in favor of Amco Insurance Company and against defendants Swagat Group, LLC, Marjorie Braucher, and Bonnie Leiser. Entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 1/20/2010. (CT, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
34
OPINION - THEREFORE, Plaintiff AMCO Insurance Company's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (d/e 20) is ALLOWED in part and DENIED inpart. It is allowed to the extent that judgment on the pleadings is entered in favor of AMCO Insurance Company and against Choice Hotels International and Vasant Patel. It is denied to the extent that the Court declines to enter judgment on the pleadings against Swagat Group LLC, Marjorie Braucher, and Bonnie E. Leiser. This case is referred to Magistrate Charles H. Evans for scheduling. Entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 2/9/2009. (CT, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: AMCO Insurance Company v. Swagat Group LLC et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
