Shaffer v. Alter Trading Corporation
Plaintiff: William Shaffer
Defendant: Alter Trading Corporation
Case Number: 3:2008cv03006
Filed: January 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Springfield Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Byron G. Cudmore
Presiding Judge: Richard Mills
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 OPINION entered by Judge Richard Mills on 5/14/2009. The Court grants Alter's Motion for Summary Judgment {d/e 15} regarding the strict liability claim. The motion {d/e 15} is DENIED with respect to both negligence claims. (MAS, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shaffer v. Alter Trading Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Shaffer
Represented By: Randall A Wolter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alter Trading Corporation
Represented By: Troy A Howell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?