Snowden v. Adams et al
| Richard Snowden |
| Carol Adams, Grace Hou, Robert Kilbury, Kris Smith, Marjorie Olson and Jane Breen |
| 3:2008cv03051 |
| February 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Morgan |
| Charles H. Evans |
| Jeanne E. Scott |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
OPINION. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 29) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendants Hou, Kilbury, Smith, Olson, and Breen. Defendants Hou, Kilbury, Smith, Olson, and Breen are di smissed from the case. Summary judgment is denied as to Defendant Adams. This case remains set for final pretrial conference on October 17, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. The parties are advised to read the General Rules for Conduct of Counsel in the Courtroom and During Trial in Proceedings before U.S. District Judge Sue Myerscough, available at the Court's website: www.ilcd.uscourts.gov. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 9/1/2011. (CC, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
9
OPINION: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (d/e 4) is ALLOWED. The Complaint is dismissed, but the Plaintiff is given leave to file an amended complaint by December 23, 2008. The Defendants are directed to respond to the amended complaint by January 15, 2009. Entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 11/21/08. (ME, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
