Elder et al v. Williamson
| John C Elder, IV, Shone Foster, Jason Harris, Kelvin Burnom and Maurice E Allen |
| Neil Williamson |
| 3:2008cv03102 |
| April 21, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Sangamon |
| Harold A. Baker |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER Granting Summary Judgment entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 7/19/2010.The defendants' motions for summary judgment are granted (d/e's 50, 53). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendants and agai nst the plaintiff. All pending motions are denied as moot, and this case is terminated, with the parties to bear their own costs. If the plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he must file a notice of appeal with this court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). (MAS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
20
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 10/27/2008. Defendants Brauer and Matticks are dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim against them. By November 7, 2008, Plaintiff Foster is directed to show good cause why he should not be dismissed as a plaintiff for failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. The defendants shall file an answer within the time prescribed by Local Rule. (MAS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
