Wilson v Hulick
Petitioner: Daniel W Wilson
Respondent: Donald Hulick
Case Number: 3:2008cv03153
Filed: July 18, 2008
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Springfield Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Jeanne E. Scott
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 OPINION entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 4/21/2009. Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (d/e 17) is ALLOWED; Petitioner's Request for Certificate of Appealability (d/e 19) is ALLOWED in part; and the Motion to Appoint Counsel on Appeal (d/e 20) is referred to the Court of Appeals. Petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (MAS, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson v Hulick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel W Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Donald Hulick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?