Columbia Mutual Insurance Company v. R.B.Erection, Inc. et al
| Columbia Mutual Insurance Company |
| R.B.Erection, Inc., Halverson Construction Company, Inc., T-Corp. and Douglas Gagnon |
| 3:2008cv03179 |
| June 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Sangamon |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Jeanne E. Scott |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
OPINION entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 12/03/2008: Columbia's Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendants R.B. Erection, Inc. and Douglas Gagnon (d/e 26) is ALLOWED as it relates to Defendant Douglas Gagnon. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. All pending motions are denied as moot, and this case is closed. (DM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
27
OPINION entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 11/4/2008: SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendants R.B. Erection, Inc. and Douglas Gagnon (d/e 26) is ALLOWED, in part. The Court enters default judgment in favor of Plaintiff Columbia Mutual Insurance Company and against Defendant R.B. Erection, Inc. The Court reserves ruling on Columbia's request for default judgment against Defendant Douglas Gagnon. Columbia is granted leave to make supplemental filings relating to Gagnon as set forth above on or before November 18. 2008. (DM, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
