Jano Justice Systems Inc v. Burton et al
| Jano Justice Systems Inc |
| Sam Burton and SCB Systems Inc |
| 3:2008cv03209 |
| September 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Personal Property: Other Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Richard Mills |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
OPINION entered by Judge Richard Mills on 05/20/2010. This Opinion provides the rationale for the Court's summary Text Order entered on March 31, 2010. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Because the Plaintiff has failed to post the necessary bond, the Court's Preliminary Injunction Order, entered June 10, 2009, is hereby WITHDRAWN. There is no injunction currently in force in this matter. (DM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
34
OPINION: The motion for reconsideration [d/e 32] is GRANTED to the extent it seeks imposition of the security requirement; it is DENIED with regard to the alleged necessity of a hearing. Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 7/1/09. (ME, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
30
OPINION entered by Judge Richard Mills on 06/09/2009. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. (DM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
14
OPINION entered by Judge Richard Mills on 01/27/2009: SEE WRITTEN OPINION. The Court ADOPTS Judge Cudmore's R & R [d/e 11], which denied Plaintiff's motion [d/e 6]. (DM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
12
OPINION entered by Judge Richard Mills on 12/11/2008. Defendants' motion to dismiss [d/e 8] is GRANTED with respect to the portions of Count IV premised on deceptive trade practices within the meaning of 815 ILCS 510/2(a)(1). JJS's motion for leave to amend is GRANTED. Regarding Counts II, III, and the remaining portions of Count IV, Defendants' motion [d/e 8] is DENIED. Defendants' motion for "judgment on the pleadings" [d/e 8] on Count I is also DENIED. (DM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
11
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by U.S. Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment 6 be DENIED. See written order. Objections to R&R due by 1/5/2009. (LB, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
