West v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Central District West v. Commissioner of Social Security

West v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Stephanie West
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	3:2009cv03024
Filed:	February 11, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV Office
County:	Douglas
Presiding Judge:	Byron G. Cudmore
Presiding Judge:	Jeanne E. Scott
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 12, 2010	Filing 24 OPINION entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 03/12/2010. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. The Motion for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d/e 22) is GRANTED in part. The Court awards Plaintiff Stephanie L. West attorneys' fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act in the amount of $3,406.25. (DM, ilcd)
November 23, 2009	Filing 19 OPINION entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 11/23/2009. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 12) is GRANTED. The Commissioner's Motion for Summary Affirmance (d/e 16) is DENIED, and his Decision is REVER SED to the extent outlined above. This matter is remanded pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Sentence 4, for a re-hearing on whether West's pancreatitis in combination with diabetes medically equals relevant listing criteria, and for a determination of West's RFC that takes into account the entire record. All other pending motions are DENIED as MOOT. This case is closed. (DM, ilcd)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 12, 2010

Filing 24 OPINION entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 03/12/2010. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. The Motion for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d/e 22) is GRANTED in part. The Court awards Plaintiff Stephanie L. West attorneys' fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act in the amount of $3,406.25. (DM, ilcd)

November 23, 2009

Filing 19 OPINION entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 11/23/2009. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 12) is GRANTED. The Commissioner's Motion for Summary Affirmance (d/e 16) is DENIED, and his Decision is REVER SED to the extent outlined above. This matter is remanded pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Sentence 4, for a re-hearing on whether West's pancreatitis in combination with diabetes medically equals relevant listing criteria, and for a determination of West's RFC that takes into account the entire record. All other pending motions are DENIED as MOOT. This case is closed. (DM, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: West v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie West
Represented By:	Peter C Drummond
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?