Morford v. Ott

Morford v. Ott

Petitioner:	Larry E Morford
Respondent:	Andrew K Ott
Case Number:	3:2009cv03096
Filed:	April 13, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Montgomery
Presiding Judge:	Jeanne E. Scott
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 29, 2009	Filing 7 OPINION entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 4/29/2009. The Attorney General for the State of Illinois is ordered to file an answer pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 Cases to Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habe as Corpus on or before July 17, 2009, and to provide the Court with a copy of trial transcripts on or before that date. Petitioner is granted 21 days from the time the answer is filed to file a reply. The Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauper is (d/e 5) is DENIED as moot. The filing fee has been paid. Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (d/e 4) is DENIED. The Motion for Certification of Probable Cause of Appeal in 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 Cases and Appointment of Counsel (d/e 6) is DENIED. (MAS, ilcd)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 29, 2009

Filing 7 OPINION entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 4/29/2009. The Attorney General for the State of Illinois is ordered to file an answer pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 Cases to Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habe as Corpus on or before July 17, 2009, and to provide the Court with a copy of trial transcripts on or before that date. Petitioner is granted 21 days from the time the answer is filed to file a reply. The Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauper is (d/e 5) is DENIED as moot. The filing fee has been paid. Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (d/e 4) is DENIED. The Motion for Certification of Probable Cause of Appeal in 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 Cases and Appointment of Counsel (d/e 6) is DENIED. (MAS, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morford v. Ott
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Larry E Morford
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Andrew K Ott
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?