Fosnock v. Macoupin County Sheriff's Department et al
Plaintiff: Steven Fosnock
Defendant: Macoupin County Sheriff's Department, Don Albrecht, Joe Goodman, Jane Doe, Russell Alexander and . Cullinan
Case Number: 3:2009cv03240
Filed: September 17, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Springfield Office
County: Macoupin
Presiding Judge: Byron G. Cudmore
Presiding Judge: Jeanne E. Scott
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 OPINION: Defendant Cullinan's Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (d/e 27) is DENIED as MOOT, Defendant HPLs Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (d/e 33) is ALLOWED, in part. Fosnock's Count I c laims against Health Professionals Limited that are based on a respondeat superior or vicarious liability theory are dismissed. Count II of the Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. HPL's Motion to Dismiss is denied in all other resp ects. Plaintiff Steven Fosnock's Motion for Leave to File his Second Amended Complaint (d/e 31) is DENIED. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a third amended complaint on or before August 15, 2010. The matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Cudmore for further scheduling. Entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 7/7/10. (ME, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fosnock v. Macoupin County Sheriff's Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Fosnock
Represented By: Van-Lear P Eckert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Macoupin County Sheriff's Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Don Albrecht
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe Goodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Russell Alexander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: . Cullinan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?