Abbott et al v. Sangamon County et al
Cindy C Abbott and Travis Abbott |
Sangamon County, Neil Williamson and Troy M Sweeney |
3:2009cv03261 |
October 5, 2009 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Springfield Office |
Sangamon |
Byron G. Cudmore |
Jeanne E. Scott |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 94 OPINION denying 91 Motion for New Trial. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/18/2013. (CT, ilcd) |
Filing 48 OPINION - Therefore, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2),Plaintiff Motion (d/e 46) is GRANTED and Defendants County ofSangamon and Sheriff Neil Williamson are DISMISSED. Plaintiff didnot indicate whether the dismissal should be with or without prejudice.Rule 41(a)(2) provides that unless the order states otherwise, a dismissalunder Rule 41(a)(2) shall be without prejudice. The dismissal is withoutprejudice. SO ORDERED. CASE CLOSED. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 1/5/2012. (CT, ilcd) |
Filing 44 OPINION - For the reasons stated, Deputy Sweeney's Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 37) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are directed to inform this Court of its intentions regarding Defendants Sangamon County and Neil Williamson by November 14, 2011. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/3/2011. (CT, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.