Cooper v. Redpath et al
| Joseph Cooper |
| Charles Redpath, Scott Ligon, B Harhasen and Sangamon County Medical Facility |
| 3:2009cv03308 |
| November 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Sangamon |
| Harold A. Baker |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
MEMORANDM OPINION AND ORDER: It is therefore ordered: (1) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. Rule 56, Defendants' summary judgment motion 29 is granted. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaint iff. Further, Defendants are awarded costs. This case is terminated in its entirety.(2) If the plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he must file a notice of appeal with this court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (4). A motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis should set forth the issues the plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). If the plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $455.00 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. Furthermore, if the appeal is found to be non-meritorious, the plaintiff may also accumulate another strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 8/30/2011. (ME, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
