Hess et al v. Kanoski & Associates et al
| Lawrence J Hess and Vickie C Warren |
| Kanoski & Associates, Ronald J Kanoski and Kennith W Blan, Jr |
| 3:2009cv03334 |
| December 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Charles H. Evans |
| Jeanne E. Scott |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on March 28, 2014. Defendant's 93 Request for Oral Argument on its Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Plaintiff's 95 Partial Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Defendant's 92 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Counts I and II are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment, closing the case. (JD, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
50
OPINION (See Written Opinion): The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Motion to Dismiss [d/e 36] is ALLOWED. The Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The case is CLOSED. Entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 03/11/2011. (VM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
16
OPINION entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 04/23/2010. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. The Motion to Dismiss (d/e 13) is DENIED. Defendants are ordered to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiffs' Complaint on or before May 7, 2010. This matter is referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Charles H. Evans for a Rule 16 scheduling conference. (DM, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
