Lewis v. USA
Petitioner: Ernest E Lewis
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 3:2010cv03044
Filed: February 19, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Springfield Office
County: Tazewell
Presiding Judge: Jeanne E. Scott
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 OPINION: Petitioner's Pro Se Motion Under the Provisions of Rule 60(b)(4); (b)(6) Of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (d/e 23) is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. Entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 7/20/2011. (VM, ilcd)
October 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 11 JUDGMENT in favor of USA against Ernest E Lewis. (VM, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewis v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ernest E Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Gregory K Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?