Mulder v. Phillips et al
| Michael G Mulder |
| Larry J Phillips, Katrina Parker, Bret F Dees, Curtis Parsons, Javier Perez, Joseph Hankins, . Schostak and Any and all other unnamed and unknown persons discovered through the course of discovery to have participated in the violations complained of herein |
| 3:2010cv03057 |
| March 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Schuyler |
| Harold A. Baker |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1) The defendants' motion for summary judgment are granted 23 and 25 . The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. This case is terminated, in its entirety, with the parties to bear their own costs. (2) If the plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he must file a notice of appeal with this court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). A motion for leave to appea l in forma pauperis should set forth the issues the plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). If the plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $455.00 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 9/21/11. (ME, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
