Isringhausen Imports, Inc. v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
| Isringhausen Imports, Inc. |
| Nissan North America, Inc., Nissan Motor Company, Ltd., Nissan Design America, Inc. and Nissan Jidosha Kaisha, Trading As Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. |
| 3:2010cv03253 |
| September 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Sangamon |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Michael M. Mihm |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 12/5/2011. The Combined Motion (d/e 39) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (SEE WRITTEN ORDER) This case is REFERRED back to Judge Cudmore for further pre-trial proceedings. (MAS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
50
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough. Nissan Japan's Motion (d/e 43) is GRANTED. Dismissal is WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Trading as Nissan Motor Co Ltd terminated.) Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 12/1/2011. (MAS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 4/6/2011. Judge Cudmore's Report and Recommendation (d/e 23) is ADOPTED and Nissan North America, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (d/e 16) is ALLOWED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. This case is REFERRED back to Judge Cudmore for further pre-trial proceedings. (MAS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
