Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Parlavecchio et al
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc |
Marc Parlavecchio, William L. Seman and The Field House, Inc. |
3:2010cv03294 |
November 10, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Springfield Office |
Adams |
David G. Bernthal |
Michael P. McCuskey |
Cable/Satellite TV |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 OPINION (See Written Opinion): Plaintiff's Motion (d/e 33) is GRANTED. It is ordered that judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants Jim Drewes, Tammy Drewes, and Daniel Osborne in the total amount of $15,409. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 9/27/2011. (VM, ilcd) |
Filing 39 OPINION (See Written Opinion):The Court orders Plaintiff to file a brief, with any additional affidavits or supporting evidence attached as exhibits, in which Plaintiff supports its request for damages with an analysis of the relevant factors for a damages calculation under §§ 553 or 605 by September 22, 2011. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 9/01/2011. (VM, ilcd) |
Filing 36 OPINION (See Written Opinion): For the reasons stated, Plaintiff's Objections (d/e 35) are GRANTED and the Report and Recommendation (d/e 34) is REJECTED. Plaintiff is given leave to serve summons on DJT's agent. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 8/10/2011. (VM, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.