Williamson v. Twaddell et al
| Clarence Bernard Williamson, III |
| William Twaddell, John/Jane Doe and Richard Young |
| 3:2010cv03325 |
| December 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Brown |
| Harold A. Baker |
| Charles H. Evans |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
OPINION: Defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied (d/e 81 ). The "Doe" defendants are dismissed without prejudice for failure to identify them for service. Plaintiff's motion to submit additional facts is denied as unnec essary (d/e 101 ). Plaintiff's "motion for disclosure statement" explaining why his motion for additional facts was timely submitted is denied as moot (d/e 106 ). A final pretrial conference is scheduled for January 14, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.. Defense counsel shall appear in person. Plaintiff shall appear by video conference. See written Opinion. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 9/4/2012. (MJ, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
91
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 3/15/2012. See written Opinion. (MJ, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
59
OPINION: Plaintiff's motions to compel are denied (d/e's 33, 40, 46, 49). Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/18/2011. Defendants shall provide to Plaintiff the information directed in paragraph (1) by December 5, 2011. Plaintiff's "Motion Demonstrating Defendants Adverse Actions and Retaliation Claims" is denied to the extent Plaintiff seeks to add new claims to this case or asks for an order prohibiting alleged retaliation. See written Opinion. (MJ, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
45
OPINION: Plaintiff's motion to reconsider the denial of his motions for preliminary injunction is denied (d/e 28). Plaintiff's motion to reconsider the denial of his motion for sanctions is denied (d/e 29). Plaintiff's motion for servi ce of subpoenas is denied (d/e 30). Plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint is denied (d/e 32). Plaintiff's motion to file a supplemental pleading is granted (d/e 38). Plaintiff's motion for an order directing that his depositi on be taken in the attorney visiting room, rather than in the "disciplinary visiting area," is denied (d/e 41). Deposition arrangements are up to the prison. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file his motion to compel regarding his inte rrogatories to Defendant Twaddell is granted (d/e 27). The clerk is directed to docket the motion to compel attached to d/e 27. Defendants shall have until November 4, 2011, to file a response. The Court will rule on all of the pending motions to compel in a separate order. Plaintiff's motion to extend the discovery deadline to October 30, 2011, is denied as unnecessary (d/e 37). Discovery is not set to close until November 30, 2011. See written Opinion. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/17/2011. (MJ, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
