Harris v. Walls et al
| Larry G Harris |
| Phillip D Pool, Steven B Ashcraft, . Jennings, J R Walls and Forrest J Ashby |
| 3:2011cv03074 |
| March 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Lawrence |
| Harold A. Baker |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
OPINION (See Written Opinion): IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted (d/e 86 ). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment infavor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. All pending motions are deni ed as moot (d/e's 101-105), and this case is terminated, with the parties to bear their own costs. All deadlines and settings on the Courts calendar are vacated. 2. If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this judgment, he must file a notice of appeal w ith this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). A motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis should identify the issues Plaintiff will present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(c). If Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $505.00 appellate filing fee regardless of the outcome of the appeal. Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 7/07/2014. (VM, ilcd) Modified on 7/7/2014 (VM, ilcd).
|
|
Filing
73
OPINION (See Written Opinion) 1) Plaintiff's motion to clarify his motion to compel is granted (d/e 70 ). 2) Plaintiff's motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part (d/e 65 ). Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 8/30/2013. (VM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
46
OPINION (See Written Opinion): 1) Plaintiff's motion to supplement his motion to amend is granted (d/e 42 ). 2) Plaintiff's motion to alter judgment is granted in part and denied in part (d/e 28 ). The Court's judgment is altered to reflect the dismissal of this case with leave to reinstate upon the restoration of good time credits lost as a result of the disciplinary ticket issued May 24, 2009.3) Defendants' submissions show that Plaintiff's good time at issue in thi s case has been restored in full. Accordingly, this case is reinstated. The clerk is directed to reopen this case. Plaintiff's motion for a video conference is denied as moot (d/e 43 ). Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 07/06/2012. (VM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
26
Opinion (See Written Opinion): 1) Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted (d/e 17). This case is dismissed, without prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot, and this case is terminated, with the parties to bear their own costs. All deadlines and settings on the Court's calendar are vacated, if any. 2) If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this judgment, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). A motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis should identify the issues Plaintiff will present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(c). If Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $455.00 appellate filing fee regardless of the outcome of the appeal. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 02/07/2012. (VM, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
