Stuller et al v. USA
| Estate of Harold Stuller, deceased, Wilma Stuller and L.S.A., Inc. |
| The United States of America and its Agency, Secretary, Treasury Department, Internal Revenue Service |
| 3:2011cv03080 |
| March 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Sangamon |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Richard Mills |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
OPINION: The Motion of the Plaintiff's to Alter or Amend the Judgment 60 is DENIED. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION). Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 3/3/2015. (GL, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
58
OPINION: The Clerk will enter Judgment in favor of Defendant UnitedStates of America. Pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation as reflected in the Final Pretrial Order, the Plaintiffs are entitled to a refund of the late payment penalty assessed against them in the amount of $16,454.69, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6651(a)(2) for the tax year 2003, plus statutory interest. Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 7/22/2014. (ME, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
57
OPINION (See Written Opinion): The Motion of Defendant United States of America to Exclude any Expert Testimony from Mack Motes on the issue of whether the Plaintiffs carried on their Horse-Breeding Operation with the Intent of Earning a Profit [d/e 30 ] is ALLOWED. The Parties' other evidentiary Objections have been addressed as provided in this Order. Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 7/10/2014. (VM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
37
OPINION (See Written Opinion): The Motion in Limine of Defendant United States of America to Quash the Subpoena Issued to IRS Revenue Agent Mark Wade [d/e 29 ] is DENIED. The Motion in Limine of Defendant United States of America to Preclude Mack Motes from Testifying as an Expert on the Issue of whether the Plaintiffs Carried on their Horse-Breeding Operation with the Intent of Earning a Profit or, in the alternative, to Allow Voir Dire with the opportunity to Renew this Motion [d/e [30 ]] is hereby Held in Abeyance, as provided in this Order. The Motion in Limine of Defendant United States of America to Exclude Evidence Regarding the Plaintiff's Expectation that the Property at issue would increase in value under 26 C.F.R. § 1.183-1(d) [d/e 31 is DENIED, as provided in this Order. Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 3/27/2013. (VM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION by U.S. Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Plaintiffs' Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of an Objection to Plaintiffs' Request for Admission (filed as motion to compel) 21 DENIED. See written order. (LB, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
