Lingle v. Kibby et al
| Lawrence Lingle |
| Alfreda Kibby, Eugene McAdory, Shan Jumper and Illinois Department of Human Services |
| 3:2011cv03101 |
| April 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Schuyler |
| Harold A. Baker |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
290
OPINION: Plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction/injunction and motions to amend are denied because the motions are an attempt to expand the claims in this case far beyond the claims identified above 261 , 269 , 270 , 278 , 286 . The motion to withdraw Attorney Poe as an attorney of record is granted 281 . Plaintiff's objections to the Court's orders are denied to the extent Plaintiff seeks action from the Court or reconsideration of the Court's orders 287 . Discovery is opened on the sole issue of whether the facility's rules on possession of gaming systems and electronicswithout internet capability violate Plaintiff's First Amendment rights. Discovery closes on September 28, 2018. Dispositi ve motions on this sole issue are due October 31, 2018. By July 31, 2018, Defendants are directed to respond to Plaintiff's motion for access to legal supplies 286 , informing the Court whether Plaintiff has access to paper, pen, envelopes, pos tage, typewriter, and typewriter ribbon necessary to conduct the remaining discovery in this case and address dispositive motions. The clerk is directed to terminate Attorney Poe. The scanning ban on Plaintiff is lifted. However, theonly documents Pl aintiff should be scanning to the Court at thispoint are motions to compel (if Defendants do not adequately answer Plaintiff's discovery requests), a dispositive motion, and/or a response to a dispositive motion. Plaintiff must mail his discover y requests to defense counsel and not file those requests with the Court unless the discovery requests are the subject of a motion to compel. Abuse of the scanning privileges will result in reinstatement of the ban. The clerk is directed to send this text order to Director Gregg Scott, for dissemination to the appropriate person who supervises access to the scanner. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 07/25/2018. (SKN, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
236
OPINION: IT IS ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff's motions for the Court to appoint an expert are denied (d/e's 206 , 223 ). (2) The motions for summary judgment are denied (d/e 212 , 219 ). (3) Plaintiff's motion for an extension to respon d to the dispositive motions is granted (d/e 217 ). Plaintiff has filed his response. (4) Defendants' motions for extensions to file replies are granted (d/e's 226 , 227 ). The replies have been filed. (5)Defendant Jumper's motion to join the DHS Defendants' motion to strike is granted (d/e 233 ). (6) Defendants' motion to strike Plaintiff's reply filed as docket entry 230 is denied (d/e 231 ). (7)Plaintiff's motion for docket entries is granted (d/e [ 218]) to the extent Plaintiff seeks a copy of the docket sheet. (8)Plaintiff's motion for counsel is denied (d/e 223 ). (9) This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge to conduct a settlement conference. (10) By July 10, 2017, Plaintiff is di rected to file a notice with the Court setting forth in detail the injunctive relief he seeks (i.e., what he wants the Court to order Defendants to do) and stating whether he seeks money damages as well. The notice should be short and plain. (11) Th e clerk is directed to mail a copy of the docket sheet to Plaintiff. (12) The clerk is directed to notify the Magistrate Judge of the referral of this case for a settlement conference. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 6/30/17.
|
|
Filing
85
OPINION entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 8/4/2014. Defendants' motions for summary judgment are denied 57 , 78 . Plaintiff's expert disclosures are due September 30, 2014. Defendants' expert disclosures are due October 31, 2014. Discovery closes February 27, 2015. Dispositive motions are due March 31, 2015. See written opinion. (KMR, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
39
OPINION granting 35 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and 36 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Thiscase is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim. The clerk isdirected to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff.This case is closed, parties to bear their own costs. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/17/2012. (CT, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
34
OPINION: 1. The clerk is directed to docket in this case the March 31, 2011,memo attached to the original complaint in case 11-3337 (d/e 1, p. 46).The clerk is further directed to send Plaintiff a copy of that memo.2. By January 6, 2012, Defendants a re directed to file a motion todismiss addressing whether Plaintiff states any federal claims.3. Discovery is stayed pending a ruling on Defendants' motion todismiss. 4. Plaintiff's motions to compel (d/e's 23, 24) and motion to addnew defendants (d/e 31) are denied, with leave to renew if his claimssurvive Defendants' motion to dismiss. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 12/7/2011. (CT, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
