The Passavant Memorial Area Hospital Association v. Lancaster Pollard & Co. et al
| The Passavant Memorial Area Hospital Association |
| Lancaster Pollard & Co., Lancaster Pollard Asset Management, LLC and Steve Kennedy |
| Steve Kennedy, Lancaster Pollard Asset Management, LLC and Lancaster Pollard & Co. |
| Jason L George, Allison M Brinkley and Peck, Shaffer & Williams |
| 3:2011cv03116 |
| May 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Morgan |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Charles H. Evans |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 3/15/2013. The Motion to Dismiss, d/e 87 is DENIED. This matter is referred back to Judge Cudmore for further pretrial proceedings. (MAS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
83
OPINION entered by Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore on 4/2/2012. Passavant Memorial Area Hospital Association's Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint, d/e 80 is ALLOWED. Defendants are directed to file their responsive pleadings by April 20, 2012. (MAS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
78
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 01/20/2012. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. The Court GRANTS Third Party Defendants' Motion to Reconsider (d/e 65) and VACATES the portion of the September 30, 2011 text order granting Plaintiff leave to f ile a Second Amended Complaint. The Second Amended Complaint (d/e 60) is STRICKEN. Plaintiff may file a Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint on or before February 1, 2012. In that Motion, Plaintiff must address (1) whether joining Geo rge or Peck, Shaffer & Williams as defendants would destroy diversity and (2) the relevant factors for determining the propriety of post-removal joinder of a nondiverse party. Defendants and Third Party Defendants may respond to the Motion for Leav e to File a Third Amended Complaint on or before February 15, 2012. The Motion to Remand (d/e 61) and Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (d/e 69) are DENIED AS MOOT. The Motions to Dismiss Third Party Complaint (d/e 23, 56) and the Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (d/e 73) remain pending. (DM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
29
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/22/2011. The Parties' Agreed Motion and Stipulation to Extension of Time to Respond to Third-Party Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (d/e 25) is GRANTED. Responses to motions filed in d/e's 19, 21, 23 and 27 are all due on or before 8/22/2011. (MAS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
